| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Hematology-Oncology Division, West Los Angeles Veteran's Administration, University of California at Los Angeles Medical Center and the Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
Requests for reprints: Alan Lichtenstein, Veteran's Administration West Los Angeles Hospital, W111H, 11301 Wilshire Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90073. Phone: 310-478-3711, ext. 40021; Fax: 310-268-4508. E-mail: alichten{at}ucla.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
One additional downstream target of mTOR is the insulin receptor substrate-1 (IRS-1), a key adapter transmitting signals from activated insulin/insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) receptors. An mTOR-dependent serine phosphorylation of IRS-1 results in its dissociation from IGF-I receptors, redistribution from low-density microsomes to cytosol, and proteasomal degradation (911) with subsequent down-regulation of insulin or IGF-I signaling. This presents a potential disadvantage with the use of mTOR inhibitors, because prevention of IRS-1 serine phosphorylation might result in enhanced signaling downstream. This could be particularly problematic in myeloma, where IGF-I-induced activation of AKT is such a key pathway for maintaining myeloma cell viability (12, 13). In fact, a recent study by Mitsiades et al. (14) suggests that IGF-I is a key mediator of serum for stimulation of proliferation and survival of multiple myeloma cells in vitro or in vivo. Thus, although clinical use of mTOR inhibitors might induce G1 arrest, by further enhancing IGF-I-induced activation, an antiapoptotic effect might ensue. To address this issue, we initiated the current investigation, testing whether mTOR inhibitors affect AKT activity in multiple myeloma cells.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Use of CCI-779 In vivo
Six nonobese diabetic/severe combined immunodeficient mice were each challenged with 3 x 107 OPM-2 cells admixed with matrigel by s.c. injection. When tumor size reached 200 mm3, three of the mice were randomly selected to receive five daily i.p. injections of CCI-779 used at 20 mg/kg, whereas the other three received vehicle alone. Eighteen hours after the last injection, mice were sacrificed, tumors were removed, and protein was extracted and pooled for immunoblot assay.
AKT Kinase Assay
The assay used a nonradioactive kit purchased from New England Biolabs (Beverly, MA). AKT was first immunoprecipitated from cell extracts and then incubated with GSK-3 fusion protein in the presence of ATP and kinase buffer. AKT-dependent GSK-3 phosphorylation was then measured by immunoblotting using a phospho-GSK-3 antibody that recognizes GSK-3 when phosphorylated.
Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase Assay
As previously described (17), protein was extracted in lysis buffer and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) activity was immunoprecipitated by anti-p85/protein A-agarose. After exhaustively washing the immunoprecipitates, the PI3K reaction was run in a mixture containing 10 mmol/L Tris (pH 7.5), 100 mmol/L NaCl, 20 mmol/L MgCl2, 0.2 mmol/L EGTA, 20 µg of phosphatidyl-4-monophosphate as substrate, 10 µmol/L ATP, and 10 µCi of (
-32P) ATP. After proceeding for 15 to 30 minutes, the reaction was terminated and lipids extracted in chloroform/methanol/HCl (100:200:2). The organic phase was collected, dried and redissolved in chloroform/methanol (1:1), and spotted on TLC plates. The plates were developed with chloroform/methanol/H2O/NH4OH (43:38:7:5), dried, and exposed to film. The location of PI(3,4)P was determined by comparison with standards in iodine-stained TLC plates.
IGF-R Blocking Experiments
Myeloma cells at 5 x 105/mL were incubated with blocking anti-IGF-R antibody (Oncogene Sciences) or control antibody (identical isotype) at 1 µg/mL for 1 hour. Cells were then either treated with or without rapamycin at 10 nmol/L for an additional 3 hours, after which AKT was immunoprecipitated for an AKT kinase assay. To confirm IGF-R blockade, we assayed tyrosine phosphorylation of the IGF-R. After 1 hour of incubation of cells with the blocking anti-IGF-R antibody or control antibody, the IGF-R was immunoprecipitated with a different antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) and the immunoprecipitate was immunoblotted with an anti-phosphotyrosine antibody.
Isolation of Primary Myeloma Cells
As described previously (17), bone marrow cells were first separated by Ficoll-Hypaque density centrifugation and plasma cells were then isolated on an immunoabsorption column using biotinylated anti-CD38 antibody. Separated cells consisted of >98% plasma cells.
Assessment of Endogenous IRS-1 Function
Endogenous IRS-1 was assayed as previously described (12). Briefly, after cell lysis, IRS-1 was immunoprecipitated with an antibody obtained from Upstate Biotechnology and subsequently bound to protein Acoupled beads. Eluted proteins were electrophoresed in 10% SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted with antibodies to detect IRS-1 Ser312 phosphorylation, IRS-1 tyrosine phosphorylation, and IRS-1 interaction with IGF-R.
Apoptosis Assay
Apoptosis was identified by neo expression of membrane Annexin V as previously described (3).
Use of Mutant IRS-1
Wild-type human IRS-1, subcloned in pcDNA3, was a gift of Dr. R.A. Roth. Ser312 was mutated to alanine with the QuikChange XL mutagenesis kit using the sense primer 5'-GCATCACCGCCACCGCCCCGGCCAGCA-3' and the antisense primer 5'-TGCTGGCCGGGGCGGTGGCGGTGATGC-3'. The plasmids and mutant sites were verified by sequencing. Both wild-type and mutant IRS-1 were transfected into myeloma cells by electroporation as previously described (18), using 250 V and a 25-millisecond pulse. Viabilities of multiple myeloma cells after electroporation averaged 605 to 75% with transduction efficiencies of 15% to 25%.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
To test if similar rapamycin-induced AKT activation occurred in primary explanted tumor cells, multiple myeloma cells were purified from the bone marrow of three patients by selection for the CD38 membrane protein and treated with or without rapamycin for 4 hours. As shown in Fig. 1E, a significant induction of AKT phosphorylation was seen in all three preparations.
In time course experiments (Fig. 2A), rapamycin was shown to enhance AKT phosphorylation within 1 to 2 hours of exposure in both 8226 and OPM-2 cell lines. As shown, this was specific for phosphorylation of the Thr308 residue of AKT. Phosphorylation of Ser473 was unaffected. Recent work (19) identifies the mTOR/Rictor complex as being the kinase responsible for phosphorylating Ser473 on AKT. However, the mTOR/Rictor complex is resistant to inhibition with rapamycin (19). This would be consistent with the inability of rapamycin to inhibit Ser473 phosphorylation on AKT at least as shown for OPM-2 cells in Fig. 2A.
|
mTOR Inhibitors Enhance Activation of PI3K in Myeloma Cells
Because AKT phosphorylation and activation is a direct result of PI3K activity through the latter's phosphorylation of phosphoinositols, we next studied PI3K. OPM-2 cells were treated with or without rapamycin for 4 hours and PI3K was immunoprecipitated and its kinase activity assayed. IGF-I treatment served as a positive control for PI3K activation. As shown in Fig. 3A, rapamycin activated PI3K kinase activity (lane 2) and the PI3K inhibitor wortmannin prevented activation. Similar activation of PI3K by rapamycin was seen in 8226 and HS-Sultan cells (data not shown).
|
Rapamycin-Induced Activation of the PI3K/AKT Cascade Is Dependent on IGF Signaling
The ability of rapamycin to prolong AKT activation during exposure to exogenous IGF-I (Fig. 2) suggested to us that rapamycin-induced AKT activation in unstimulated multiple myeloma cells could be due to effects on basal signaling from the IGF-I receptor. IGF-I is a known major myeloma growth factor (12, 13), and a recent study documents that sufficient amounts of IGF-I are present in serum in vitro and in vivo to provide a potent growth signal to multiple myeloma cells (14). To directly test if low level basal IGF-I signaling due to IGF-I in serum was crucial to the resulting rapamycin-induced activation of PI3K/AKT, we prevented basal signaling in OPM-2 cells with a blocking anti-IGF-R antibody. As shown in Fig. 4, the anti-IGF-R antibody completely prevented the ability of rapamycin to activate AKT. Confirmation of IGF-R blockade was shown by the antibody's inhibition of basal IGF-R tyrosine phosphorylation (Fig. 4B). These data support the notion that rapamycin-induced activation of AKT is dependent on basal IGF-I/IGF-R signaling.
|
|
Similar results could be shown by transient transfection with a FLAG-tagged IRS-1 construct (Fig. 5B). Transfected cells were treated with or without rapamycin for 4 hours; the IRS-1 was immunoprecipitated with a FLAG antibody and immunoblotted with antibody to detect serine phosphorylation and association of IRS-1 with IGF-R. As shown in Fig. 5B (left), rapamycin was capable of inhibiting serine phosphorylation of FLAG-tagged IRS-1 and enhanced its interaction with IGF-R. To specifically test the role of Ser312 phosphorylation, we also transiently transfected a FLAG-tagged IRS-1 with a serine-to-alanine mutation at residue 312. Transfected cells were similarly treated with or without rapamycin and the mutant IRS-1 was immunoprecipitated. As shown in Fig. 5B (right), the mutant protein could not be phosphorylated at Ser312 as expected. In addition, although the mutant protein constitutively associated with a higher amount of IGF-R compared with the wild-type IRS-1, rapamycin was unable to increase this association as it did for the wild-type IRS-1. These data prove that the rapamycin-enhanced interaction between IRS-1 and IGF-R is due to its ability to prevent Ser312 phosphorylation.
Effects of Rapamycin on IRS-1 Degradation
Serine phosphorylation of IRS-1 also results in its targeting for exit from low-density microsomes into cytosol where it is ultimately degraded by the 26S proteosome (911, 20). Thus, prevention of IRS-1 serine phosphorylation could also theoretically enhance downstream signaling by preventing its proteosomal degradation. To address this possible mechanism, we treated multiple myeloma cells with the proteasome inhibitors lactocystin or PS-341. As shown in Fig. 6A, neither drug was able to activate multiple myeloma cell AKT even when used in up to 6 hours of incubations. To test an effect on IRS-1 degradation, multiple myeloma cells were transfected with the tagged wild-type IRS-1 and kept overnight in low serum. The next day, cells were moved to 10% FCS and incubated with or without rapamycin (10 nmol/L) or PS-341 (1 µmol/L). At 1, 3, and 5 hours, IRS-1 was immunoprecipitated and immunoblotted for either total IRS-1 or serine-phosphorylated IRS-1. As shown in Fig. 6B, following exposure to 10% FCS, multiple myeloma cells show a slow degradation of IRS-1 between 1 and 5 hours (left). However, when exposure to 10% FCS occurs in the presence of either rapamycin or PS-341, IRS-1 degradation is prevented. Although PS-341 prevented degradation of IRS-1, it could not inhibit IRS-1 serine phosphorylation, whereas, once again, rapamycin was effective in this regard (Fig. 6C).
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The rapamycin-induced stimulation of PI3K/AKT activity was associated with prevention of IRS-1 phosphorylation at Ser312. In other cell types, Ser312 phosphorylation of IRS-1 is an integral piece of a feedback inhibition pathway that down-regulates signaling. Following IGF-I/insulin-induced stimulation of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway, an mTOR-dependent serine phosphorylation of IRS-1 uncouples it from its IGF-I/insulin receptors thus inhibiting its tyrosine phosphorylation and further capacity to signal downstream (22). The ability of rapamycin to prevent IRS-1 serine phosphorylation in multiple myeloma cells in addition to the enhanced interaction between IRS-1 and IGF-I receptors suggests the following scenario: low-level, serum-containing IGF-I stimulation of multiple myeloma cells results in IRS-1 binding to stimulated IGF receptors (IGF-R) and downstream signaling through PI3K/AKT to mTOR and a secondary mTOR-dependent serine phosphorylation of IRS-1. The resulting balance between low-level positive signaling and feedback inhibition-negative signaling provides the continuous basal degree of signaling of multiple myeloma cells in serum. However, when negative feedback inhibition is prevented by a rapamycin-induced block of mTOR-dependent IRS-1 serine phosphorylation, a significant enhancement of IRS-1 binding to IGF-I receptors ensues with resulting increases in IRS-1 tyrosine phosphorylation, binding to PI3K p85, p85 tyrosine phosphorylation, PI3K activity, and AKT activity. Results presented in Fig. 5, with a mutated IRS-1 construct, confirm the role of effects on IRS-1 Ser312 phosphorylation in rapamycin's ability to enhance binding of IRS-1 to IGF-R. A similar prevention of the negative feedback effect of IRS-1 serine phosphorylation presumably explains the prolongation of AKT activation in IGF-I-stimulated 8226 multiple myeloma cells.
In addition to uncoupling IRS-1 from IGF-Rs, serine phosphorylation targets it for exit from low-density microsomes into the cytosol, where it is degraded by the 26S proteasome (911). Thus, the ability of rapamycin to inhibit IRS-1 phosphorylation and subsequent proteasome degradation could theoretically participate in up-regulating signaling downstream through AKT. However, the results shown in Fig. 6, in which proteasome inhibitors prolong IRS-1 protein survival but do not activate multiple myeloma cell AKT, indicate that a simple prevention of IRS-1 degradation is not sufficient to activate AKT. A rapamycin-dependent prevention of redistribution of IRS-1 from microsomes to cytosol, however, may prolong its colocalization with p85 PI3K thus also contributing to activation of PI3K/AKT.
Recent studies suggest additional layers of complexity by which mTOR and mTOR inhibitors affect AKT function. Harrington et al. (23) have shown that the mTOR substrate p70S6kinase (p70) can also affect IRS-1 function by direct phosphorylation on Ser302, which prevents IRS-1 binding to insulin receptors. Thus, in a similar fashion to the current study, an mTOR inhibitor could activate AKT function by preventing mTOR-dependent, p70-mediated phosphorylation of IRS-1. Quite possibly, phosphorylation at Ser302 (by p70) and Ser312 (by mTOR) is additive in causing inhibition of IRS-1 function. In contrast, when mTOR is complexed with rictor, it can directly phosphorylate and activate AKT (19). However, this mTOR-rictor activity is not inhibited by mTOR inhibitors like rapamycin (19). Thus, a fragile balance may exist where, by inducing phosphorylation of IRS-1 in cells stimulated by IGF-I, mTOR inhibits AKT activation, but via direct interaction, it activates AKT. However, when mTOR inhibitors like rapamycin are introduced, the balance is disrupted as only the rapamycin-sensitive phosphorylation of IRS-1 is interrupted, whereas direct AKT activation by mTOR-rictor is maintained. The result would be significant rapamycin-induced AKT activation.
In a prior study (2), we found that heightened AKT activity, due to PTEN mutations, sensitized myeloma cells to G1 arrest induced by mTOR inhibitors. It is, thus, interesting that, by inducing AKT activation, mTOR inhibitors may be able to sensitize cells to their own cytostatic effect, although one would expect that a PTEN-null cell line would still be more sensitive than a PTEN wild typecontaining cell line. However, by activating AKT, mTOR inhibitors could theoretically enhance an antiapoptotic mechanism in multiple myeloma cells. Indeed, we found that rapamycin modestly but significantly inhibited apoptosis induced by the antimultiple myeloma agent PS-341. The rapamycin concentrations that inhibited apoptosis correlated with those capable of activating AKT. In contrast, combination or rapamycin with dexamethasone (24) or with Revlimid (25) resulted in enhanced multiple myeloma cell death. Thus, some interactions between mTOR inhibitors and anti-myeloma agents may be antagonistic possibly due to activation of the antiapoptotic AKT, and other interactions may be synergistic. Additional preclinical studies will be valuable to learn how best to combine this potentially efficacious drug with other agents.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Received 3/11/05; revised 7/15/05; accepted 8/11/05.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B. M. Wolpin, A. F. Hezel, T. Abrams, L. S. Blaszkowsky, J. A. Meyerhardt, J. A. Chan, P. C. Enzinger, B. Allen, J. W. Clark, D. P. Ryan, et al. Oral mTOR Inhibitor Everolimus in Patients With Gemcitabine-Refractory Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer J. Clin. Oncol., January 10, 2009; 27(2): 193 - 198. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Chaisuparat, J. Hu, B. C. Jham, Z. A. Knight, K. M. Shokat, and S. Montaner Dual Inhibition of PI3K{alpha} and mTOR as an Alternative Treatment for Kaposi's Sarcoma Cancer Res., October 15, 2008; 68(20): 8361 - 8368. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. David, R. Sinha, J. Chen, S.-Y. Sun, J. L. Kaufman, and S. Lonial Perifosine Synergistically Enhances TRAIL-Induced Myeloma Cell Apoptosis via Up-Regulation of Death Receptors Clin. Cancer Res., August 15, 2008; 14(16): 5090 - 5098. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Zemskova, E. Sahakian, S. Bashkirova, and M. Lilly The PIM1 Kinase Is a Critical Component of a Survival Pathway Activated by Docetaxel and Promotes Survival of Docetaxel-treated Prostate Cancer Cells J. Biol. Chem., July 25, 2008; 283(30): 20635 - 20644. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Q. Lacy, M. Alsina, R. Fonseca, M. L. Paccagnella, C. L. Melvin, D. Yin, A. Sharma, M. Enriquez Sarano, M. Pollak, S. Jagannath, et al. Phase I, Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Study of the Anti-Insulinlike Growth Factor Type 1 Receptor Monoclonal Antibody CP-751,871 in Patients With Multiple Myeloma J. Clin. Oncol., July 1, 2008; 26(19): 3196 - 3203. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Barbone, T.-M. Yang, J. R. Morgan, G. Gaudino, and V. C. Broaddus Mammalian Target of Rapamycin Contributes to the Acquired Apoptotic Resistance of Human Mesothelioma Multicellular Spheroids J. Biol. Chem., May 9, 2008; 283(19): 13021 - 13030. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Tabernero, F. Rojo, E. Calvo, H. Burris, I. Judson, K. Hazell, E. Martinelli, S. R. y Cajal, S. Jones, L. Vidal, et al. Dose- and Schedule-Dependent Inhibition of the Mammalian Target of Rapamycin Pathway With Everolimus: A Phase I Tumor Pharmacodynamic Study in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors J. Clin. Oncol., April 1, 2008; 26(10): 1603 - 1610. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Kong, S. Banerjee, W. Huang, Y. Li, Z. Wang, H.-R. C. Kim, and F. H. Sarkar Mammalian Target of Rapamycin Repression by 3,3'-Diindolylmethane Inhibits Invasion and Angiogenesis in Platelet-Derived Growth Factor-D-Overexpressing PC3 Cells Cancer Res., March 15, 2008; 68(6): 1927 - 1934. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Moreno, A. Akcakanat, M. F Munsell, A. Soni, J. C Yao, and F. Meric-Bernstam Antitumor activity of rapamycin and octreotide as single agents or in combination in neuroendocrine tumors Endocr. Relat. Cancer, March 1, 2008; 15(1): 257 - 266. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Huston, X. Leleu, X. Jia, A.-S. Moreau, H. T. Ngo, J. Runnels, J. Anderson, Y. Alsayed, A. Roccaro, S. Vallet, et al. Targeting Akt and Heat Shock Protein 90 Produces Synergistic Multiple Myeloma Cell Cytotoxicity in the Bone Marrow Microenvironment Clin. Cancer Res., February 1, 2008; 14(3): 865 - 874. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Meske, F. Albert, and T. G. Ohm Coupling of Mammalian Target of Rapamycin with Phosphoinositide 3-Kinase Signaling Pathway Regulates Protein Phosphatase 2A- and Glycogen Synthase Kinase-3 -dependent Phosphorylation of Tau J. Biol. Chem., January 4, 2008; 283(1): 100 - 109. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Q. Lun, H. Zhou, T. Alain, B. Sun, L. Wang, J. W. Barrett, M. M. Stanford, G. McFadden, J. Bell, D. L. Senger, et al. Targeting Human Medulloblastoma: Oncolytic Virotherapy with Myxoma Virus Is Enhanced by Rapamycin Cancer Res., September 15, 2007; 67(18): 8818 - 8827. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Younes, X. Leleu, E. Hatjiharissi, A.-S. Moreau, T. Hideshima, P. Richardson, K. C. Anderson, and I. M. Ghobrial Targeting the Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase Pathway in Multiple Myeloma Clin. Cancer Res., July 1, 2007; 13(13): 3771 - 3775. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. T. Kurmasheva, F. C. Harwood, and P. J. Houghton Differential regulation of vascular endothelial growth factor by Akt and mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors in cell lines derived from childhood solid tumors Mol. Cancer Ther., May 1, 2007; 6(5): 1620 - 1628. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Shi, T. Reiman, W. Li, C. A. Maxwell, S. Sen, L. Pilarski, T. R. Daniels, M. L. Penichet, R. Feldman, and A. Lichtenstein Targeting aurora kinases as therapy in multiple myeloma Blood, May 1, 2007; 109(9): 3915 - 3921. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Fonseca and A. K. Stewart Targeted therapeutics for multiple myeloma: The arrival of a risk-stratified approach Mol. Cancer Ther., March 1, 2007; 6(3): 802 - 810. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Mateo-Lozano, P. C. Gokhale, V. A. Soldatenkov, A. Dritschilo, O. M. Tirado, and V. Notario Combined Transcriptional and Translational Targeting of EWS/FLI-1 in Ewing's Sarcoma. Clin. Cancer Res., November 15, 2006; 12(22): 6781 - 6790. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Di Paolo, A. Teutonico, D. Leogrande, C. Capobianco, and P. F. Schena Chronic Inhibition of Mammalian Target of Rapamycin Signaling Downregulates Insulin Receptor Substrates 1 and 2 and AKT Activation: A Crossroad between Cancer and Diabetes? J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., August 1, 2006; 17(8): 2236 - 2244. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Shukla, X. Coumoul, L. Cao, R.-H. Wang, C. Xiao, X. Xu, S. Ando, S. Yakar, D. LeRoith, and C. Deng Absence of the full-length breast cancer-associated gene-1 leads to increased expression of insulin-like growth factor signaling axis members. Cancer Res., July 15, 2006; 66(14): 7151 - 7157. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||