| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Department of Cancer Pharmacology, Pfizer Global Research and Development, Ann Arbor Laboratories, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105 [A. J. K., B. G. H., J. M., R. L. M.], and Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia 22908 [C. A. M., C. D. A.]
1 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Cancer Pharmacology, Pfizer Global Research and Development, Ann Arbor Laboratories, 2800 Plymouth Road, Ann Arbor, MI 48105. Phone: (734) 622-7759; Fax: (734) 622-7158; E-mail: Alan.Kraker{at}pfizer.com
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Recent research into dynamic histone acetylation is particularly significant in this regard. Proteins known to function in transcriptional activation, including GCN5 in yeast and CBP/p300, PCAF, and TAFII250 in humans, possess HAT3 activity (79). Acetylation by multiprotein complexes containing these enzymes neutralizes the positive charge associated with the
-amino group of conserved lysine residues within the NH2-terminal domains of the core histones H2A, H2B, H3, and H4. In general, this is thought to enhance the accessibility of nucleosomal DNA for transcription by attenuating direct masking by the NH2-terminal domains and also by destabilizing higher order folding of nucleosomal filaments mediated by internucleosomal contacts made by these domains (3, 4). Additionally, recent evidence suggests that recognition of acetylated residues in histones contributes to locus-specific recruitment of transcriptional regulators containing bromodomain motifs (10, 11). It is important to note that although most of the information currently available on HATs focuses on the relationship between histone acetylation and transcriptional activation, evidence that HATs such as Esa1 and SAS2 are required for cell cycle progression and transcriptional silencing, respectively (12, 13), suggests additional roles for acetylation. Moreover, evidence that transcription factors, including EKLF, GATA-1, HMG I(Y), TFIIE, TFIIF, and the tumor suppressor p53, are acetylated by certain HATs suggests that mechanisms using acetylation to regulate transcription and other nuclear processes are not exclusive to histones (8).
Conversely, the action of HDACs, enzymes that restore the positive charge to lysine residues upon hydrolysis of
-amino acetyl moieties, is generally associated with repression of transcription, and many of the HDACs characterized, to date, are components of multiprotein complexes containing other proteins known to function in transcriptional repression (4, 14). Isolation of the first protein identified to be an HDAC and many subsequent analyses of HDAC function have exploited the availability of small molecule inhibitors of HDACs (1517). These compounds have contributed significantly to our understanding of the regulation of histone acetylation and gene transcription. Evidence that some of these compounds also inhibit cell proliferation has led to studies examining their use in antitumor therapy and the relationship of histone acetylation to cell growth (1823). HDAC inhibitors known to have antiproliferative effects belong to several different chemical classes, including (a) compounds containing hydroxamic acids such as TSA and suberoylanilide hydroxamine acid, (b) short-chain fatty acids such as butyric acid, (c) cyclic tetrapeptides containing an epoxy moiety such as trapoxin, (d) cyclic tetrapeptides without epoxy groups such as apicidin, and (e) benzamides, e.g., MS-27-275 (reviewed in Ref. 24).
A substituted benzamide compound (CI-994; structure shown in Fig. 1) has been the subject of study in clinical trials for a number of neoplastic diseases (2528), although the mechanism of action of this compound has not been elucidated. Effects of the compound on cellular processes related to cell cycle progression and the phosphorylation and stability of a low molecular weight nuclear protein (possibly a histone) that correlate with growth inhibition by the compound have been described previously (29). Although the identity of this low molecular weight protein remains unknown, the potential significance of modulation of histone modifications by CI-994 led us to examine the effects of CI-994 on histone acetylation. Here, we show that histone H3 is rapidly hyperacetylated in cultured HCT-8 cells after treatment with CI-994. Assays to determine the effect of CI-994 on the HAT activity of recombinant Gcn5 and on the HDAC activity of HDAC-1 and HDAC-2 complexes immunoprecipitated from HCT-8 cells both provide evidence that hyperacetylation in vivo results from inhibition of HDACs by CI-994. Monitoring histone acetylation may provide a useful tool for evaluation of pharmacodynamic and toxicological parameters in CI-994 therapy that could lead to improvements in its clinical application. Furthermore, our evidence that HDAC inhibition is a cellular mechanism will facilitate additional investigation of the mechanism of the antitumor effect of CI-994.
|
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Cells.
HCT-8 cells were grown in logarithmic phase in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum. For growth delay studies, cells were seeded into 96-well plates at 2000 cells/well (180 µl/well) and allowed to attach and enter log phase growth before treatment with the growth inhibitory compounds. Compounds were diluted into growth medium containing not more than 0.5% (vol/vol) DMSO and then added to the cells. Cells were treated continuously for 3 days with compounds, fixed with 10% TCA, incubated for 30 min at 4°C, washed five times with tap water, stained with the protein dye sulfrhodamine B according to published protocols (30), and evaluated for growth in a 96-well plate absorbance reader.
Nuclear Extract.
Partially purified HDAC was prepared from HCT-8 cells following a published method (31). The final nuclear extract containing the deacetylase gave 1.5 mg/ml protein. The nuclear extracts were assayed as previously described (31) with the modification that the assay interval was 20 min rather than 4 h.
Determination of Acetylated Histone.
Cells for evaluation of histone acetylation levels were seeded into 10-cm plates at 2.2 x 106 cells/plate, treated the next day with compound or solvent control, and then processed for histone extraction as follows. Cells were scraped from the culture plates into PBS, centrifuged at 1000 rpm (250 x g) for 10 min, washed with PBS and then resuspended in 1.0 ml of extraction buffer [10 mM HEPES (pH 7.9), 1.5 mM MgCl2, 10 mM KCl, 0.5 mM DTT, and 250 µM 4-(2-aminoethyl) benzenesulfonylfluoride (protease inhibitor)]. Sulfuric acid was added to 0.4 N, and the precipitate was incubated on ice for 30 min. The precipitate was centrifuged in a microfuge at 14400 rpm for 10 min at 4°C. The supernatant liquid was transferred into a new tube and made 20% in TCA. The resulting pellet was washed once in acetone containing 0.1% HCl and once in acetone alone. The precipitate (collected by centrifugation) was dried by desiccation. This pellet was then resuspended in Laemmli sample buffer (for tris-glycine gels) or tris-bis sample buffer (for tris-bis gels), electrophoresed through either 420% polyacrylamide gradient tris-glycine gels or for later experiments, through 10% polyacrylamide tris-bis gels. The resolved proteins were transferred to nitrocellulose membranes and then Western blotted for total histone or acetylated histone.
Immunoprecipitation Assay for HDAC Activity.
Whole cell lysates of HCT-8 and MX-1 xenografts from untreated animals were prepared by homogenizing tumor pieces in lysis buffer [20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM Na EDTA, 10% glycerol, 0.5% NP40, 1 mM PMSF, 10 µg/ml aprotinin, pepstatin, and leupeptin; 0.5 ml/100 mg tissue). Lysates were clarified by centrifugation (12,000 x g) for 10 min at 4°C. For each HDAC immunoprecipitation assay, 50 µl of clarified homogenate (
200 µg total protein) were diluted with 450 µl TBST [20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl, and 0.1% Tween 20] containing 1 mM PMSF in a 1.5-ml microcentrifuge tube. Equal amounts (0.5 µg) of purified IgG from rabbit antisera to HDAC-1 (no. 06-720; Upstate Biotechnology) or to HDAC-2 (no. sc-7899; Santa Cruz Biotechnology) were then added and immune complexes allowed to form for 1 h at 4°C. Protein A-Sepharose (10 µl of settled beads) was then added, and the components were mixed on a rotator for 1 h at 4°C. Immune complexes were collected by centrifugation and washed five times with cold TBST. The beads were then washed once in cold assay buffer [20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 150 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, 1 mM PMSF, 10 µg/ml aprotinin, pepstatin, and leupeptin] and resuspended in 200 µl of assay buffer. Compounds to be tested for inhibition of deacetylase activity were then added and the mixture incubated for 20 min on ice. An aliquot corresponding to 40,000 dpm of hyperacetylated histones (labeled with 3H-acetate in culture) was then added to each tube and the reactions mixed on a rotator for 1 h at 30°C. Tubes were centrifuged briefly, and the reactions terminated by adding 50 µl of stop buffer (1.0 M HCl, 0.16 M CH3COOH). Each reaction was then extracted with 600 µl of ethyl acetate and 3H-acetate release determined by liquid scintillation counting a 500 µl aliquot of the ethyl acetate phase.
3H-acetate labeled histones were prepared by incubating 108 HeLa cells in 25 ml of DMEM containing 10 mM butyrate and 5 mCi 3H-acetic acid, Na salt (4.1 Ci/mmol; NEN no. NET003H) for 3 h at 37°C. The cells were then washed three times in Tris-buffered saline and nuclei prepared as previously described (32), except that 100 nM TSA was included in the lysis and wash buffers. Histones were extracted with 0.4 N H2SO4 and recovered by TCA precipitation (20% w/v final). The specific activity of the resulting crude histones was
4000 dpm 3H/µg.
Effect of Deacetylase Inhibitors on Yeast GCN5 in Vitro.
The effects of CI-994 and TSA on the HAT activity of recombinant yeast GCN5 in vitro were assayed using purified GCN5 expressed in bacteria as described previously (33). Reactions containing 10 µg of chicken erythrocyte core histones,
4 pmol of yGCN5, various amounts of CI-994 and TSA, and 25 µl of 2x HAT assay buffer [100 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 20% glycerol, 2 mM EDTA, 2 mM DTT, and 1 mM PMSF] in a total volume of 40 µl, were assembled in microtubes on ice. The concentrations of CI-994 and TSA tested were achieved by adding 5 µl of 10x working stocks prepared as described above, and reactions were incubated on ice for 20 min before the addition of 3H-acetylCoA. Reactions were initiated by adding 0.1 µCi of 3H-acetylCoA (1.88 Ci/mmol; NEN no. NET290) in a volume of 10 µl to each tube with incubation at 30°C for 10 min. Duplicate aliquots of 10 µl were then spotted on squares of P81 paper (Whatman) and histone acetylation quantitated by liquid scintillation counting as described previously (34).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Acetylated Histone H3 Levels.
On the basis of earlier work that had shown a time- and concentration-dependent effect of CI-994 on cell cycle progression, thymidine incorporation, levels of a Mr 16,000 phosphoprotein, and cell growth (29), we exposed HCT-8 cells to different concentrations of CI-994 for various intervals. Cells were then lysed and histones prepared by acid extraction to enable analyses of acetylation status. Fig. 2 shows Western blots of acetylated histone H3 and total histone H3 from HCT-8 cells treated with 1 or 10 µM CI-994 for 9, 5, or 2 h. Cultures treated with 50 nM TSA were processed in parallel to serve as a positive control because this treatment has been shown previously to induce histone acetylation (35). After either 5 or 9 h of treatment, both concentrations of CI-994 clearly caused increases in the amount of acetylated histone H3 relative to the untreated control sample, as did the positive control agent TSA. After 2 h of treatment, the levels of acetylated H3 were elevated in cells exposed to 10 µM CI-994, but the effect was less apparent with 1 µM compound. Although the amount of total histone H3 (Fig. 2, bottom panel) analyzed varied somewhat from sample to sample, the fold increase in signal intensity for acetylated H3 between control and treated samples far exceeded the variation in signal for total H3 in nearly all cases. Examination of the time course of H3 hyperacetylation in HCT-8 cells treated with 10 µM CI-994 over a wider range of intervals (Fig. 3) revealed that measurable increases in acetylated histone H3 were seen after as little as 30 min of treatment, with the largest portion of the total increase apparent by 9 h.
|
|
|
12% of crude HDAC activity remained in the presence of 6.25 nM TSA, the lowest concentration tested. This potent inhibition of crude HDAC activity by TSA seems to correlate well with the degree of H3 hyperacetylation observed in cells exposed to 50 nM TSA (Figs. 2 and 3). However, the degree of H3 hyperacetylation observed in cells exposed to 10 µM CI-994 (Figs. 2 and 3) exceeds that expected based on the apparent IC50 of 2550 µM CI-994 observed in this assay.
|
100 µM CI-994 apparent under the conditions used. MS-275 exhibited a concentration-dependent inhibition of HDAC-1 with potency similar to that of CI-994. Similar to the findings on crude HDAC activity reported above, TSA was a significantly more potent inhibitor of HDAC-1 with an apparent IC50 falling between 4 and 40 nM in agreement with previously published results (19, 40). The same potency for CI-994 against HDAC-1 isolated from MX-1 mammary tumor xenograft tumor tissue was also seen (data not shown). Fig. 6B shows the equipotent effect of CI-994 and MS-275 against HDAC-2 isolated from HCT-8 cells. As with HDAC-1, TSA is a very potent inhibitor with an IC50 between 4 and 40 nM.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The results of the experiments presented here provide evidence that the antitumor activity of CI-994 is linked to its ability to inhibit HDACs. Increased acetylation of histone H3 was apparent as early as 30 min after addition of CI-994 to HCT-8 cells, which was the earliest characterized cellular response to the compound. The next most immediate effects known were the loss of a Mr 16,000-phosphorylated nuclear protein after
68 h of treatment with CI-994 followed by the imposition of a G1 cell cycle arrest (29). Other HDAC inhibitors, including MS-275 (N-(2-aminophenyl)-4-[N-(pyridin-3yl-methoxycarbonyl)aminomethyl]benzamide) and trapoxin (a natural cyclotetrapeptide) have been shown to cause a G1 cell cycle block in other cell types (22, 43).
In addition to inhibition of histone acetylation in intact cells, CI-994 also inhibited catalytic activity of HDACs from crude nuclear extracts assayed in vitro with a synthetic substrate but with lower potency than that seen in cells. When the mixture of HDACs present in crude nuclear extract from HCT-8 cells was used for direct determination of enzyme inhibition (Fig. 5), CI-994 was also found to be significantly less potent than TSA. A portion of this difference in potency between CI-994 and TSA may be attributable to the use of a 3H-acetylated H4 synthetic peptide substrate in these experiments. If CI-994 and TSA affect different subsets of HDACs, differences in the substrate preferences of these enzymes could introduce bias in assays performed with a single type of substrate. Because we can restore most or all activity by repeatedly washing anti-HDAC-1 immunoprecipitates after CI-994-treatment, we infer that CI-994 is a reversible inhibitor of HDACs (data not shown).
A compound that is structurally similar to CI-994, designated MS-275, shown previously to be an inhibitor of HDAC (21, 22) showed potency similar to that of CI-994 in isolated enzyme in vitro assays used here (Fig. 6). The concentrations of CI-994 at which inhibition was seen in these two in vitro assays were well above those that resulted in increases in acetylated histone in whole cells. This difference in CI-994 potency between whole cell and in vitro-isolated enzyme assays may be attributable to the different conditions of the assays. Unlike the in vitro assays, subcellular compartmentalization was intact in the cellular assays, and appropriate concentrations of cofactors and other physiological regulatory elements were in place when cells were used to assess the effect of CI-994 on histone acetylation. When immunoprecipitated HDAC-1 or HDAC-2 were used as the source of enzyme (Fig. 6), potencies for enzyme inhibition by CI-994 were obtained that were very similar to one another in each of the isoforms and, furthermore, were similar to potency of CI-994 seen in the crude nuclear preparations of HDAC. Different isoforms of the HDACs (14, 37) may be differentially expressed in cells, may have different substrate specificities, and may be differentially sensitive to inhibitors leading to variable patterns of apparent potency. Sensitivity of HDAC isoforms to small molecule inhibitors is under study by us and others (39, 44, 45). Data in this study suggest that for at least HDAC-1 and HDAC-2, these substituted benzamide inhibitors do not show isoform selectivity. Additional experimentation will be required to fully address this possibility.
Analyses of the composition of the Sin3, NuRD, and Mi2 complexes prepared by chromatographic or affinity methods have shown that HDAC1 and HDAC2 coexist in these complexes in vivo (4648). This association potentially compromises the ability of immunoprecipitation to determine the relative inhibition of HDAC1 and HDAC2 by CI-994 and other compounds. However, because Western blot analyses demonstrate that anti-HDAC1 immunoprecipitates from whole cell lysates contain much more HDAC1 than HDAC2 and conversely that anti-HDAC2 immunoprecipitates from whole cell lysates contain much more HDAC2 than HDAC1 (49, 50), we infer that the deacetylase activities we have measured derive, for the most part, from the intended form.
In this study overall, the in vitro inhibition of HDAC using two different types of assays combined with similar results seen with a structurally related compound (MS-275) that has been characterized as a direct inhibitor of HDAC supports the characterization of CI-994 as an inhibitor of HDAC.
Another possible explanation of differences in potency of effect of CI-994 between in vitro isolated enzyme or partially purified cellular fractions and effect in whole cells may lie in possible metabolic products of CI-994 that possess greater potency than the parent compound. However, the available evidence suggests only minimal structural modification of the compound takes place in vivo leaving parent compound intact in plasma or in urinary or fecal excretion (41, 51), thus leading to the conclusion that metabolism is not likely an explanation for the observed differences.
Because an increase in acetylated histone in cells could result from an activation of HAT, as well as from an inhibition of HDAC, we evaluated the effects of CI-994 on the in vitro activity of the HAT GCN5 (Fig. 4). The compound showed no activation of HAT activity at concentrations up to 100 µM. This demonstrates, especially in the context of the inhibition of HDAC seen in vitro, that the compound does not affect histone acetylation by activation of HAT under these conditions.
A continuing challenge exists in understanding how HDAC inhibition by CI-994 relates to its antitumor activity. The cell cycle distribution effects of the compound resulting in a primary block at the G1-S boundary (29) may reflect induction of cell cycle inhibitory proteins such as p21waf1/cip1, which is induced by a number of other HDAC inhibitors (22, 36, 43), but this remains to be determined. In addition, induction of apoptosis has been described as a consequence of HDAC inhibition by a variety of small molecule inhibitors (40, 43, 52). Whether CI-994 participates in this induction in cells or tumors also remains to be seen, although a recent in vivo study showing tumor shrinkage of LC12 squamous cell lung carcinoma treated with either CI-994 alone or in combination with gemcitabine suggests that apoptosis may be a mechanism through which the compound is exerting an antitumor effect (53, 54).
A better understanding of the use of CI-994 in ongoing clinical trials may be gained through application of the knowledge of its inhibitory effect on HDAC. In vivo antitumor efficacy studies and continuing clinical investigation of CI-994 done in combination with conventional antitumor agents may shed more light on the optimal use of the compound as a better understanding is gained of the potential benefits associated with appropriate manipulation of histone modifications in cancer therapy.
| Footnotes |
|---|
3 The abbreviations used are: HAT, histone acetyltransferase; HDAC, histone deacetylase; CI-994, 4-(acetylamino)-N-(2-aminophenyl)benzamide; PMSF, phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride; TCA, trichloroacetic acid; TSA, trichostatin A. ![]()
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indi-cate this fact.
Received 12/10/01; revised 11/26/02; accepted 2/ 3/03.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. A. Richards, K. A. Boehm, D. M. Waterhouse, D. J. Wagener, S. S. Krishnamurthi, A. Rosemurgy, W. Grove, K. Macdonald, S. Gulyas, M. Clark, et al. Gemcitabine plus CI-994 offers no advantage over gemcitabine alone in the treatment of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: results of a phase II randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study Ann. Onc., July 1, 2006; 17(7): 1096 - 1102. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Entin-Meer, A. Rephaeli, X. Yang, A. Nudelman, S. R. VandenBerg, and D. A. Haas-Kogan Butyric acid prodrugs are histone deacetylase inhibitors that show antineoplastic activity and radiosensitizing capacity in the treatment of malignant gliomas Mol. Cancer Ther., December 1, 2005; 4(12): 1952 - 1961. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. D. Undevia, H. L. Kindler, L. Janisch, S. C. Olson, R. L. Schilsky, N. J. Vogelzang, K. A. Kimmel, T. A. Macek, and M. J. Ratain A phase I study of the oral combination of CI-994, a putative histone deacetylase inhibitor, and capecitabine Ann. Onc., November 1, 2004; 15(11): 1705 - 1711. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |