
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Divisions of Experimental Therapeutics [S. S. W. N., D. W. H.] and Molecular and Cellular Biology [M-S. T.], Ontario Cancer Institute, and Departments of Medical Oncology and Hematology [D. W. H.], Laboratories of Medicine and Pathobiology [M-S. T., T. N.] and Medical Biophysics [S. S. W. N., M-S. T., D. W. H.], Princess Margaret Hospital and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2M9, Canada
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
27,000 new cases are diagnosed every year in North America (2), there is an urgent need to develop novel treatment strategies to reduce the mortality of pancreatic cancer patients.
Receptor tyrosine kinases regulate epithelial cell growth, differentiation, and death. On ligand binding, the receptor autophosphorylates and subsequently stimulates a diverse signaling network resulting in cell proliferation and survival. It is well documented that pancreatic adenocarcinomas and dysplasias frequently overexpress receptor tyrosine kinases such as EGFR,3 HER-2/neu, and Met/HGFR (3). Furthermore, ligands such as epidermal growth factor and transforming growth factor
are secreted by both malignant cells and surrounding dysplastic pancreatic ductal cells (4). It has been shown that overexpression of EGFR and its ligands contributes to the malignant phenotype and correlates with the decrease in survival in pancreatic cancer patients (5). These observations suggest that enhanced EGFR signaling via autocrine and/or paracrine loops is pivotal in the biology of pancreatic cancer and that blockade of EGFR represents an attractive strategy in the treatment of the disease.
EGFR can be selectively blocked by a number of small molecule inhibitors such as OSI-774 (Tarceva; formerly known as CP-358,774) or monoclonal antibodies. OSI-774 has been reported to inhibit EGFR autophosphorylation in vitro (IC50 = 2 nM) and in intact tumor cells (IC50 = 20 nM), as well as to induce apoptosis in human colon cancer cells (6). The PI3k-PKB/Akt and Raf-ERK pathways, both of which are downstream of EGFR, have been shown to mediate cell survival (7). As demonstrated in our previous studies, inhibition of the PI3k-PKB/Akt pathway by wortmannin promotes gemcitabine-induced apoptosis in human pancreatic cancer (8, 9). It seems logical to postulate that the use of OSI-774, which blocks the Raf-ERK pathway, in combination with wortmannin would be more efficacious in enhancing apoptosis induced by gemcitabine. Furthermore, OSI-774 may additionally inhibit the PI3k-PKB/Akt pathway. The objective of the current study was to examine the effects of OSI-774 alone and in combination with wortmannin and/or gemcitabine on downstream signaling molecules, as well as apoptosis in primary pancreatic cancer xenografts implanted orthotopically in SCID mice.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
3 x 3 x 3 mm. Five to 6-week-old male SCID mice, weighing 1823 g, were anesthetized with isoflurane (Janssen Pharmaceutica, North York, Ontario, Canada). An incision was made in the upper left abdomen, and the pancreas was exposed. Tumor pieces were attached to the pancreas using 40 chromic gut suture (Roboz Surgical Instrument Co. Inc., Rockville, MD). The pancreas was then returned to the peritoneum, and the abdominal wall and the skin were closed with 40 chromic gut and silk sutures (Roboz Surgical Instrument Co. Inc.), respectively. The animals were allowed to recover. These primary patient xenografts were propagated continuously in SCID mice for in vivo drug testing.
Immunohistochemistry
Five-µm-thick sections of paraffin-embedded, formalin-fixed s.c. and orthotopic tumor tissues were stained with H&E for histological examination. For detection of EGFR, Met/HGFR, and HER-2/neu, sections were stained with a monoclonal anti-EGFR antibody (1:100; Zymed Laboratories Inc., San Francisco, CA), polyclonal anti-Met/HGFR, and anti-Her2/neu antibodies (1:100; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA), respectively. Antigens were visualized using the streptavidin-biotin-peroxidase method.
Treatment Protocols
Gemcitabine was obtained from Eli Lilly & Co. (Indianapolis, IN) and dissolved at 20 mg/ml in 0.9% NaCl. Wortmannin was purchased from BioMol (Philadelphia, PA), dissolved at 0.4 mg/ml in DMSO, and diluted with 0.9% NaCl before use. OSI-774 (formerly known as CP-358,774) was a gift from OSI Pharmaceuticals (Uniondale, NY). The compound was dissolved at 10 mg/ml in DMSO.
Tumor-bearing SCID mice were randomly assigned to one of the following eight treatment groups (n = 4 each): (a) the vehicle control; (b) gemcitabine (80 mg/kg, i.v.); (c) wortmannin (0.7 mg/kg, i.v.); (d) gemcitabine + wortmannin; (e) OSI-774 (50 mg/kg, i.p.); (f) gemcitabine + OSI-774; (g) wortmannin + OSI-774; and (h) gemcitabine + wortmannin + OSI-774. For group h, gemcitabine was given at 0 h followed by wortmannin at 48 h and OSI-774 at 51 h. A similar schedule was used in other groups, except that the drug not included in the treatment regimen was substituted with the corresponding vehicle. All of the mice were sacrificed 52 h after the administration of gemcitabine. The schedules for gemcitabine and wortmannin were based on our recent publication (9), and those for OSI-774 was selected with reference to information in Moyer et al. (6). Harvested tumors were snap frozen in OCT (Miles Inc., Elkhart, IN) in liquid nitrogen, and subsequently processed for immunofluorescence staining and TUNEL assay.
Quantification of Phosphorylated Forms of PKB/Akt, ERK1/2, and EGFR
Indirect Immunofluorescence.
Because the tumors were interspersed with variable amounts of necrotic and nonmalignant tissues, a quantitative immunofluorescence technique was developed to examine levels of the phosphorylated forms of PKB/Akt, ERK1/2, and EGFR in viable tumor areas. Seven serial sections (5-µm thick) were obtained from each frozen tumor, mounted on glass slides, and then fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde. The first section was stained with H&E for transmitted light microscopy. The remaining sections were incubated with primary antibodies (Cell Signaling Technology, Beverly, MA) directed against the following proteins: phosphoPKB/Akt (serine 473; 1:10), PKB/Akt (1:50), phosphoERK1/2 (1:10), ERK1/2 (1:100), phosphoEGFR (Transduction Laboratories; 1:10), or EGFR (1:100) for 1.5 h. A Cy3-conjugated donkey antirabbit IgG (1:200; Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) was used as the secondary antibody. Secondary antibody used alone is control for nonspecific background. All of the sections were counterstained with the DNA-specific dye 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (Molecular Probes) at 1 µg/ml to outline the nuclear area.
Computerized Image Analysis. Composite digital images of the entire H&E sections were captured using a color CCD video camera (Sony DXC 970 MD) mounted on a Zeiss Axioskop transmitted light microscope fitted with an autostage and linked to a MicroComputer Image Device (Imaging Research Inc., St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada). These images were used to select representative areas of viable tumor tissues for analysis of the fluorescence markers.
Viable tumor tissues labeled with the anti-phosphoPKB/Akt, anti-PKB/Akt, anti-phosphoERK1/2, anti-ERK1/2, anti-phosphoEGFR, or anti-EGFR antibodies were examined using a second MicroComputer Image Device image analysis system equipped with a Xillix MicroImager (Xillix, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada) mounted on an Olympus BX50 reflected fluorescence microscope. Each individual field was obtained using a x40 objective. Twenty random 0.149-mm2 fields of the same tumor and four tumors per group were analyzed. The Cy3-conjugated secondary antibody were excited using a 540-nm bandpass filter with emission collected at 610 nm. For phosphoPKB/Akt and phosphoERK1/2 staining, the nuclear image obtained with 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole was used to create a mask, which was then overlaid on the Cy3 fluorescence image, so that only nuclear phosphoPKB/Akt fluorescence was measured. It has been shown that PKB/Akt and ERK1/2 translocate to the nucleus on phosphorylation (10). For PKB/Akt and ERK1/2 staining, total Cy3 fluorescence was measured. The fluorescence intensities of Cy3 were expressed as mean integrated optical densities, which are measures of the amounts of labeled phosphoPKB/Akt, PKB/Akt, phosphoERK1/2, and ERK1/2 in the tumor sections. The levels of phosphoEGFR and EGFR were expressed as the sum of positively stained areas divided by the microscopic field area.
Apoptosis Assay
Five serial sections (5-µm thick) were obtained for each frozen tumor, mounted on glass slides, and then fixed in 1% paraformaldehyde. The first section was processed for H&E staining. TUNEL assay was performed on the remaining four sections using the ApopTag Red kit according to the manufacturers instructions (Intergen Co., Purchase, NY). Tissue sections processed in the absence of terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase served as negative controls. The rhodamine-conjugated secondary antibody was excited using a 540-nm bandpass filter with emission collected at 610 nm.
Using the fluorescence image analysis system described above fitted with a Quantix cooled CCD camera (Photometrics Inc., Tucson, AZ), tiled images of tumor sections subjected to TUNEL assay were acquired using a x20 objective. Four sections of the same tumor and four tumors per group were analyzed. Tumors were traced manually with reference to the parallel H&E sections so as to exclude edges and necrotic and nonmalignant tissues from analysis. Apoptotic nuclei, often consisting of clusters of discrete nuclear fragments, could be readily defined using image analysis criteria so as to reject artifacts. The extent of apoptosis in each tumor, expressed as proportional area, was calculated from the sum of the TUNEL-positive pixel area divided by the total viable tumor area.
Statistics
All of the values are presented as mean ± SE. Comparisons between control and treatment groups were made with ANOVA followed by Student Newman-Keuls test, with P < 0.05 as the criterion for statistical significance.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Blockade of EGFR Activation. Immunofluorescence measurements demonstrated that the levels of EGFR were approximately three times higher in orthotopic xenografts from OCIP#2 than those from OCIP#7 (data not shown). Fig. 2, A and B, illustrate plots of the ratio of phosphorylated EGFR to EGFR versus various treatment regimens in both patient xenografts. In OCIP#2 and OCIP#7 tumors, i.p. injection of 50 mg/kg OSI-774 1 h before sacrifice significantly reduced the levels of phosphorylated EGFR by 68-fold in the tumors. Treatment with gemcitabine (80 mg/kg for 48 h) or wortmannin (0.7 mg/kg for 4 h) alone, or in combination, neither altered EGFR phosphorylation nor enhanced the effect of OSI-774.
|
50%. Such inhibition was unchanged by OSI-774. Gemcitabine alone had no effect on PKB/Akt phosphorylation. Total PKB/Akt levels were comparable between control and treated orthotopic tumors established from OCIP#2 and OCIP#7 (data not shown).
|
33% (P < 0.05) in OCIP#2 but not in OCIP#7 xenografts. Total ERK1/2 levels were similar between control and treated orthotopic tumors established from the two patients (data not shown). The effect of OSI-774 was not modified by additional treatment with wortmannin. Gemcitabine or wortmannin alone, or in combination, had no detectable effects on phosphorylated ERK1/2 levels.
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In accordance with our previous findings (8), wortmannin monotherapy was able to enhance gemcitabine-induced apoptosis in OCIP#2 xenografts. This effect was additionally potentiated by the inclusion of OSI-774 in the treatment regimen. ERK1/2 has been shown to inhibit apoptosis in hematopoietic cells by blocking caspase activation after cytochrome c release from the mitochondria and by phosphorylating BAD (12). The mechanisms by which PKB/Akt mediates cell survival include regulation of glycogen synthase kinase-3ß (7), BAD (13), nuclear factor -
B, and Bcl-XL (14). Not surprisingly, the reduction of both phosphoERK1/2 and phosphoPKB/Akt levels by OSI-774 and wortmannin caused a greater increase in apoptosis than the reduction of each alone. However, gemcitabine-induced apoptosis in OCIP#7 xenografts was only evident with the combined use of OSI-774 and wortmannin but not with wortmannin alone. The status and/or expression levels of other signaling molecules such as p53, Ki-Ras, and other receptor tyrosine kinases may contribute to the variable responses to EGFR blockade and PI3k inhibition in the two patient xenografts.
Recently, there is increasing evidence demonstrating the therapeutic potential of EGFR blockade in the management of pancreatic cancer and other malignancies. For instance, the EGFR inhibitor PKI116 and the anti-EGFR antibody C225 have been reported to block EGFR phosphorylation in L3.6pl human pancreatic carcinoma xenografts leading to decreased production of vascular epidermal growth factor, apoptosis of endothelial cells, and, therefore, inhibition of tumor-induced angiogenesis (15). Furthermore, the combination of PKI116 or C225 and gemcitabine caused more prominent tumor shrinkage than either agent used alone (15). Sirotnak et al. (16) showed that chemosensitization by yet another EGFR inhibitor ZD1839 ("Iressa"; Astra-Zeneca) does not require high levels of EGFR expression in the target tumors. Induction of apoptosis by cytotoxic drugs appears to up-regulate EGFR (17) possibly as a survival mechanism, which also makes cells more susceptible to the effect of subsequent EGFR inhibition. This may partially explain why EGFR inhibitors and cytotoxic drugs in combination are more efficacious than either class of agents used alone. It should be noted that the above effects are not exclusive to EGFR blockade. Herceptin, a selective anti-HER-2/neu antibody, has also been shown to induce greater inhibition of growth of human breast cancer xenografts when used in combination with a variety of chemotherapeutic agents (e.g., paclitaxel, doxorubicin) than when used alone (18). Taken together, these observations indicate the importance of characterizing the tumor of a patient from biopsies in the design of treatment protocols involving receptor tyrosine kinase or other signal transduction inhibitors.
It is apparent that the use of a single signal transduction inhibitor cannot antagonize all of the potentially relevant survival pathways in pancreatic cancers. For instance, OSI-774 would not overcome the downstream effects of mutant Ki-Ras. Wortmannin can reverse the effects of the two afferent pathways by directly inhibiting PI3k. However, mutant Ki-Ras or activated EGFR or other receptor tyrosine kinases can also suppress apoptosis and promote survival via PI3k-independent pathways (19). Therefore, combinations of signal transduction inhibitors will likely be required for efficacious reversal of drug resistance in pancreatic cancer patients. The ability of signal transduction inhibitors to enhance the antitumor activity of cytotoxic drugs additionally supports their introduction into the clinic.
In conclusion, it was demonstrated that OSI-774 suppresses EGFR and ERK1/2 phosphorylation, and promotes gemcitabine-induced apoptosis in combination with wortmannin. The variability of responses observed in the two primary pancreatic cancer xenografts under study suggests that characterization of patient tumors should be performed to optimize the efficacy of treatment regimens involving signal transduction inhibitors.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Hospital, 610 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2M9, Canada. Phone: (416) 946-2262; Fax: (416) 946-6546; Email: david.hedley{at}uhn.on.ca ![]()
3 The abbreviations used are: EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; PI3k, phosphatidylinositide 3'-kinase; PKB, protein kinase B; SCID, severely combined immunodeficient; ERK, extracellular signal-regulated kinase; Met/HGFR, hepatocyte growth factor receptor; OCIP#, Ontario Cancer Institute Pancreas number; TUNEL, terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (Tdt)-mediated nick end labeling. ![]()
Received 4/22/02; revised 6/25/02; accepted 6/28/02.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
.J. Clin. Investig.
,
90:1352
1360,1992
.
Yamanaka, Y., Friess, H., Kobrin, M. S., Buchler, M., Kunz, J., Beger, H. G., and Korc, M. Overexpression of Her2/neu oncogene in human pancreatic carcinoma.Hum. Pathol.
,
24:1127
1134,1993
.[CrossRef][Medline]
Moyer, J. D., Barbacci, E. G., Iwata, K. K., Arnold, L., Boman, B., Cunningham, A., DiOrio, C., Doty, J., Morin, M. J., Moyer, M. P., Neveu, M., Pollack, V. A., Pustilnik, L. R., Reynolds, M. M., Theleman, A., and Miller, P. Induction of apoptosis and cell cycle arrest by CP 384774, an inhibitor of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase.Cancer Res.
,
57:4838
4848,1997
.
B activation and Bcl-X(L) levels in vivo.J. Exp. Med.
,
191:1721
1734,2000
.This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. M. Oza, E. A. Eisenhauer, L. Elit, J.-C. Cutz, A. Sakurada, M. S. Tsao, P. J. Hoskins, J. Biagi, P. Ghatage, J. Mazurka, et al. Phase II Study of Erlotinib in Recurrent or Metastatic Endometrial Cancer: NCIC IND-148 J. Clin. Oncol., September 10, 2008; 26(26): 4319 - 4325. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. M. Thomas, M. J. Ogagan, M. L. Freilino, S. Strychor, D. R. Walsh, W. E. Gooding, J. R. Grandis, and W. C. Zamboni Antitumor Mechanisms of Systemically Administered Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Antisense Oligonucleotides in Combination with Docetaxel in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck Mol. Pharmacol., March 1, 2008; 73(3): 627 - 638. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Burris III and C. Rocha-Lima New Therapeutic Directions for Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: Targeting the Epidermal Growth Factor and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Pathways Oncologist, March 1, 2008; 13(3): 289 - 298. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. M. Harari, G. W. Allen, and J. A. Bonner Biology of Interactions: Antiepidermal Growth Factor Receptor Agents J. Clin. Oncol., September 10, 2007; 25(26): 4057 - 4065. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Moore, D. Goldstein, J. Hamm, A. Figer, J. R. Hecht, S. Gallinger, H. J. Au, P. Murawa, D. Walde, R. A. Wolff, et al. Erlotinib Plus Gemcitabine Compared With Gemcitabine Alone in Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Phase III Trial of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group J. Clin. Oncol., May 20, 2007; 25(15): 1960 - 1966. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. S. Pino, M. Shrader, C. H. Baker, F. Cognetti, H. Q. Xiong, J. L. Abbruzzese, and D. J. McConkey Transforming Growth Factor {alpha} Expression Drives Constitutive Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Pathway Activation and Sensitivity to Gefitinib (Iressa) in Human Pancreatic Cancer Cell Lines. Cancer Res., April 1, 2006; 66(7): 3802 - 3812. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Frohna, J. Lu, S. Eppler, M. Hamilton, J. Wolf, A. Rakhit, J. Ling, S. R. Kenkare-Mitra, and B. L. Lum Evaluation of the absolute oral bioavailability and bioequivalence of erlotinib, an inhibitor of the epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase, in a randomized, crossover study in healthy subjects. J. Clin. Pharmacol., March 1, 2006; 46(3): 282 - 290. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. D. Prados, K. R. Lamborn, S. Chang, E. Burton, N. Butowski, M. Malec, A. Kapadia, J. Rabbitt, M. S. Page, A. Fedoroff, et al. Phase 1 study of erlotinib HCl alone and combined with temozolomide in patients with stable or recurrent malignant glioma Neuro-oncol, January 1, 2006; 8(1): 67 - 78. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Y.F. Yau, J. J. Wheeler, K. L. Sutton, and D. W. Hedley Inhibition of Integrin-Linked Kinase by a Selective Small Molecule Inhibitor, QLT0254, Inhibits the PI3K/PKB/mTOR, Stat3, and FKHR Pathways and Tumor Growth, and Enhances Gemcitabine-Induced Apoptosis in Human Orthotopic Primary Pancreatic Cancer Xenografts Cancer Res., February 15, 2005; 65(4): 1497 - 1504. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. E. Thompson and C. B. Thompson Putting the Rap on Akt J. Clin. Oncol., October 15, 2004; 22(20): 4217 - 4226. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Perez-Soler, A. Chachoua, L. A. Hammond, E. K. Rowinsky, M. Huberman, D. Karp, J. Rigas, G. M. Clark, P. Santabarbara, and P. Bonomi Determinants of Tumor Response and Survival With Erlotinib in Patients With Non--Small-Cell Lung Cancer J. Clin. Oncol., August 15, 2004; 22(16): 3238 - 3247. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Huang, E. A. Armstrong, S. Benavente, P. Chinnaiyan, and P. M. Harari Dual-Agent Molecular Targeting of the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR): Combining Anti-EGFR Antibody with Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Cancer Res., August 1, 2004; 64(15): 5355 - 5362. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. L. Janmaat and G. Giaccone Small-Molecule Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors Oncologist, December 1, 2003; 8(6): 576 - 586. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. W. Mandell Phosphorylation State-Specific Antibodies: Applications in Investigative and Diagnostic Pathology Am. J. Pathol., November 1, 2003; 163(5): 1687 - 1698. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |