This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Xiao, Z. Articles by Zhang, H. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Xiao, Z. Articles by Zhang, H.

Research Articles: Targets

Differential roles of checkpoint kinase 1, checkpoint kinase 2, and mitogen-activated protein kinase–activated protein kinase 2 in mediating DNA damage–induced cell cycle arrest: implications for cancer therapy

Cancer Research, Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, Illinois

Requests for reprints: Haiying Zhang, Cancer Research, Abbott Laboratories, 100 Abbott Park Road, Abbott Park, IL 60064-6101. Phone: 847-938-4857; Fax: 847-935-7551. E-mail: haiying.zhang{at}abbott.com

Mammalian cells initiate cell cycle arrest at different phases of the cell cycle in response to various forms of genotoxic stress to allow time for DNA repair, and thus preserving their genomic integrity. The protein kinases checkpoint kinase 1 (Chk1), checkpoint kinase 2 (Chk2), and mitogen-activated protein kinase–activated protein kinase 2 (MK2) have all been shown to be involved in cell cycle checkpoint control. Recently, cell cycle checkpoint abrogation has been proposed as one way to sensitize cancer cells to DNA-damaging agents due to the expected induction of mitotic catastrophe. Due to their overlapping substrate spectra and redundant functions, it is still not clear which kinase is mainly responsible for the cell cycle arrests conferred by clinically relevant chemotherapeutics. Thus, the issue remains about which kinase is the most therapeutically relevant target and, more importantly, whether multiple kinases might need to be targeted to achieve the best efficacy in light of recent studies showing superior efficacy for pan-receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors. To clarify this issue, we investigated the roles of the three kinases in response to different genotoxic stresses through small interfering RNA–mediated specific target knockdowns. Our result showed that only the down-regulation of Chk1, but not of Chk2 or MK2, abrogated camptothecin- or 5-fluorouracil–induced S-phase arrest or doxorubicin-induced G₂-phase arrest. This was followed by mitotic catastrophe and apoptosis. Moreover, double inhibition of Chk1 and Chk2 failed to achieve better efficacy than Chk1 inhibition alone; surprisingly, inhibition of MK2, in addition to Chk1 suppression, partially reversed the checkpoint abrogation and negated mitotic catastrophe. We further showed that this is due to the fact that in MK2-deficient cells, Cdc25A protein, which is critically required for the mitotic progression following checkpoint abrogation, becomes greatly depleted. In summary, our findings show that Chk1 is the only relevant checkpoint kinase as a cancer drug target and inhibition of other checkpoint kinases in addition to Chk1 would be nonproductive. [Mol Cancer Ther 2006;5(8):1935–43]

Received 2/ 9/06; revised 4/11/06; accepted 5/31/06.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. D. Zabludoff, C. Deng, M. R. Grondine, A. M. Sheehy, S. Ashwell, B. L. Caleb, S. Green, H. R. Haye, C. L. Horn, J. W. Janetka, et al. AZD7762, a novel checkpoint kinase inhibitor, drives checkpoint abrogation and potentiates DNA-targeted therapies Mol. Cancer Ther., September 1, 2008; 7(9): 2955 - 2966. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Ashwell and S. Zabludoff DNA Damage Detection and Repair Pathways--Recent Advances with Inhibitors of Checkpoint Kinases in Cancer Therapy Clin. Cancer Res., July 1, 2008; 14(13): 4032 - 4037. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. M. de Bont, J. M. Kros, M. M.C.J. Passier, R. E. Reddingius, P. A.E. S. Smitt, T. M. Luider, M. L. d. Boer, and R. Pieters Differential expression and prognostic significance of SOX genes in pediatric medulloblastoma and ependymoma identified by microarray analysis Neuro-oncol, January 1, 2008; 10(5): 648 - 660. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Verlinden, I. Vanden Bempt, G. Eelen, M. Drijkoningen, I. Verlinden, K. Marchal, C. De Wolf-Peeters, M.-R. Christiaens, L. Michiels, R. Bouillon, et al. The E2F-Regulated Gene Chk1 Is Highly Expressed in Triple-Negative Estrogen Receptor /Progesterone Receptor /HER-2 Breast Carcinomas Cancer Res., July 15, 2007; 67(14): 6574 - 6581. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Ray, S. Shyam, G. C. Fraizer, and A. Almasan S-phase checkpoints regulate Apo2 ligand/TRAIL and CPT-11-induced apoptosis of prostate cancer cells Mol. Cancer Ther., April 1, 2007; 6(4): 1368 - 1378. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]