Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fontes, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Gerson, S. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fontes, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Gerson, S. L.
Mol Cancer Ther. 2006;5:121-128
© 2006 American Association for Cancer Research

Differential competitive resistance to methylating versus chloroethylating agents among five O6-alkylguanine DNA alkyltransferases in human hematopoietic cells

Aparecida Maria Fontes1, Brian M. Davis1, Lance P. Encell2, Karen Lingas1, Dimas Tadeu Covas3, Marco Antonio Zago3, Lawrence A. Loeb4, Anthony E. Pegg5 and Stanton L. Gerson1

1 Division of Hematology/Oncology and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University and University Hospitals of Cleveland, Cleveland, Ohio; 2 Promega Corporation, Madison, Wisconsin; 3 Regional Blood Center and Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto da Universidad de São Paulo, Centro de Terapia Celular, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil; 4 The Joseph Gottstein Memorial Cancer Research Laboratory, Department of Pathology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington; and 5 Department of Cellular and Molecular Physiology, Penn State Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania

Requests for reprints: Stanton L. Gerson, Division of Hematology Oncology, BEB-3 Case Western Reserve University, 10900 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44106-4955. Phone: 216-368-1177; Fax: 216-368-1166. E-mail: slg5{at}po.cwru.edu

P140K-MGMT and G156A-MGMT genes encode two O6-benzylguanine–resistant O6-alkylguanine DNA alkyltransferase proteins that confer a high degree of O6-benzylguanine and 1,3-bis(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea (BCNU) or O6-benzylguanine and temozolomide resistance to primary hematopoietic cells. In this study, we directly compared these and three other O6-benzylguanine–resistant MGMT genes for their ability to protect the human erythroleukemia cell line, K562, using a direct competitive selection strategy to identify the mutation that conferred the greatest degree of protection from O6-benzylguanine and either BCNU or temozolomide. MFG retroviral vector plasmids for each of these mutants [G156A-MGMT (ED50 for O6-benzylguanine, 60 µmol/L); and P140K-MGMT, MGMT-2 (S152H, A154G, Y158H, G160S, L162V), MGMT-3 (C150Y, A154G, Y158F, L162P, K165R), and MGMT-5 (N157T, Y158H, A170S; ED50 for benzylguanine, >1,000 µmol/L)] were mixed, and the virus produced from Phoenix cells was transduced into K562 cells. Stringent selection used high doses of O6-benzylguanine (800 µmol/L) and temozolomide (1,000 µmol/L) or BCNU (20 µmol/L) administered twice, and following regrowth, surviving clones were isolated, and the MGMT transgene was sequenced. None of the mutants was lost during selection. Using temozolomide, the enrichment factor was greatest for P140K-MGMT (1.7-fold). Using BCNU selection, the greatest enrichment was observed with MGMT-2 (1.5-fold). G156A-MGMT, which is the least O6-benzylguanine–resistant MGMT gene of the mutants tested, was not lost during selection but was selected against. The optimal mutant MGMT useful as a drug resistance gene may depend on whether a methylating or chloroethylating agent is used for drug selection. [Mol Cancer Ther 2006;5(1):121–8]


Grant support: USPHS grants RO1CA73062, RO1ES06288, UO1CA75525, and P30CA43703.

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Note: A.M. Fontes is currently at the Regional Blood Center of Ribeirão Preto, Ribeirão Preto, SP, 14051-140 Brazil. B. Davis is currently at Virexis, Gaithersburg, Maryland. L. Encell is currently at Tanox, Inc., Department of Molecular Biology, 10301 Stella Link, Houston, TX 77025.

4 http://www.stanford.edu/group/nolan/protocols/pro_helper_dep.html

Received 7/11/05; revised 10/ 7/05; accepted 10/28/05.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 2006 by the American Association for Cancer Research.