Molecular Cancer Therapeutics Funding
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ding, W.-Q.
Right arrow Articles by Lind, S. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ding, W.-Q.
Right arrow Articles by Lind, S. E.
Mol Cancer Ther. 2004;3:1109-1117
© 2004 American Association for Cancer Research

Differential sensitivity of cancer cells to docosahexaenoic acid–induced cytotoxicity: The potential importance of down-regulation of superoxide dismutase 1 expression

Wei-Qun Ding, Joshua L. Vaught, Hanako Yamauchi and Stuart E. Lind

Departments of Pathology and Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma

Requests for reprints: Stuart E. Lind, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, 975 Northeast 10th Street, BRC-409, Oklahoma City, OK 73104. Phone: 405-271-1605; Fax: 405-271-6289/3910. E-mail: stuart-lind{at}ouhsc.edu

Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA, 22:6 n-3), a polyunsaturated fatty acid found in fish oil, exerts cytotoxic effects on cancer cells. Although DHA was toxic toward five human cancer cell lines (MCF-7, MDA-MB-231, SiHa, Raji, and DHL-4), the lines were not uniformly sensitive. DHL-4, a bcl-2 overexpressing lymphoid line, was the most sensitive (IC50, 5.2 µmol/L) and the cervical cancer cell line, SiHa, was the most resistant (IC50, >300 µmol/L). Lipid peroxidation has been cited by others as an important component of DHA toxicity, and we confirmed that vitamin E prevents the cytotoxic effects of DHA. Lipid peroxidation was greater following DHA treatment of the sensitive DHL-4 cells than in the resistant SiHa cells, as assessed by thiobarbituric acid reactive substance generation. DHL-4 cells treated with DHA for 20 hours showed a 3.5-fold increase in thiobarbituric acid reactive substances, whereas SiHa cells showed no increase. Reverse transcription-PCR analysis detected a down-regulation of the expression of the major antioxidant enzyme, superoxide dismutase (SOD) 1, in DHL-4 cells but not in SiHa cells after DHA treatment. Knockdown of SOD1 expression in SiHa cells with small interfering RNA significantly enhanced lipid peroxidation and cytotoxicity on exposure to DHA. These results show that DHL-4 cells are highly sensitive to the cytotoxic effect of DHA and that regulation of SOD1 expression may play an important role in determining the sensitivity of different tumor cells to the cytotoxic effects of DHA.


The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Received 1/12/04; revised 6/17/04; accepted 7/ 6/04.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 2004 by the American Association for Cancer Research.